![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Musician Central music theory and gear discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
eye decay
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 7,382
Rep Power: 17
![]() |
Music theory book
I want to learn more theory and I'd like some book recommendations. Eventually it would be great to get to the point of understanding jazz theory, but I doubt it would be wise to jump into a jazz book until I've mastered a more basic book.
I know a lot of theory is focused on the piano, and I know how to play piano, but I don't have access to one these days. I have the Hal Leonard book "Music Theory for Guitarists: Everything You Ever Wanted to Know But Were Afraid to Ask". That is helping me a lot with the basics, but for the most part it seems like definitions without a lot of context. Basically it spends a ton of time showing you patterns and then telling you to memorize them, but I don't need a book to tell me that. For example, I made a chart for myself of all the algebra of what interval you get when you add two others, and then I started memorizing that. What I'm looking for is more conceptual information about melody and harmony. Any suggestions? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
it's one louder
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: TX
Posts: 15,598
Rep Power: 25
![]() |
This is the standard for tonal harmony for most Theory I-IV (lower division) courses - http://www.amazon.com/Tonal-Harmony-...ref=pd_sim_b_1
get the workbook too. Kostka is a beast. In addition, I know this one is pretty good too (both volumes) - http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...BDYDMKM5FT3QPV Last edited by ChAAPY; 07-12-2012 at 11:23 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
trust the doctor
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 100
Rep Power: 0
![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
it's one louder
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: TX
Posts: 15,598
Rep Power: 25
![]() |
Quote:
Get the first book I posted Tomes. It's what we used for four semesters before enrolling in upper division theory courses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
eye decay
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 7,382
Rep Power: 17
![]() |
How did I know you would be the one to respond to this?
Cool, thanks. A real textbook is probably the way to go. Do you happen to know if the older editions are substantially different? 4th edition seems to get some poor reviews on Amazon...then again I could get it for a few bucks. The money isn't THAT important if I'd learn better from the new one. I always seem to buy the latest version when I get science textbooks. Last edited by Tomes of Deceit; 07-13-2012 at 01:25 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
it's one louder
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: TX
Posts: 15,598
Rep Power: 25
![]() |
Wait, are you looking to learn jazz theory on the guitar? Because that book is mainly about western tonal harmony during the baroque, romantic, and a tiny bit of 20th century. I think the older additions don't have the "introduction to post tonal theory" chapter and everything past that. Not sure, but I heard he only started to include those chapters because of the publisher.
Last edited by ChAAPY; 07-13-2012 at 03:19 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Queens,NY
Posts: 1,830
Rep Power: 4
![]() |
most of the theory that i know i've learned from my guitar instructor, the rest was from my semester as a music major at college. lately the book i've been using is called music reading for guitar the complete method. it was recommended to me by my guitar instructor since he used it recently at MI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
eye decay
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 7,382
Rep Power: 17
![]() |
I ordered the latest version of the book. Whatever, I could go out to eat and spend that. I think it will teach me a lot. There will be plenty of time to learn jazz if I actually stay focused about this.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
trust the doctor
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 100
Rep Power: 0
![]() |
Quote:
And no, I did not mean secondary dominant, I know what that is too :P |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
it's one louder
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: TX
Posts: 15,598
Rep Power: 25
![]() |
You're using the terms subdominant and predominant interchangeably when they don't mean the same thing. Subdominant is just the name of the scale degree, pre-dominant refers to a chord that leads to the dominant, such as the ii (iidim) and IV (iv). Other chords can function as pre-dominants as well as I'm sure you know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
trust the doctor
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 100
Rep Power: 0
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Queens,NY
Posts: 1,830
Rep Power: 4
![]() |
hell of a bump, but i felt like contributing again. over the past month or so i started and finished the theory and harmony book from mi, i thought it was awesome. i purchased the ear training book from mi as well, but have yet to start using it. recently i started using this book called jazzology, but i'm a bit put off by how long the chapters are.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|